Scuba Diving

SCUBA DIVING NEWS   ::   SCUBALINX   ::   SCUBA FORUM   ::   SCUBA POLL   ::   CYBER DIVER

Scuba Diving NewsScuba Diving CDNNScuba NewsDive Travel NewsScuba Diving Safety NewsEco NewsScuba Industry NewsScience

Dive News :: CDNNScuba Diving NewslettersCDNN Act NowCDNN PhotoCDNN InterviewCDNN Special ReportCDNN EditorialsCDNN ArticlesDestinationsDiver Alert

PAGE ONE :: WORLD NEWS :: INDUSTRY

Shark ate Shark Shield during test

Powered by CDNN - CYBER DIVER News Network
by PIA AKERMAN

ADELAIDE, Australia (1 Mar 2008) — An electronic device designed to ward sharks away from surfers failed so spectacularly during a trial off South Africa that it was eaten by a great white.

An inquest heard yesterday the Shark Shield surf model was activated on a float carrying bait when the 3.6m female shark approached. Rather than being deterred by the device, the shark, under the gaze of the Natal Sharks Board, bit into it.

South Australian Deputy State Coroner Tony Schapel yesterday heard of the test failure during the inquest into the death of Jarrod Stehbens, who was taken by a great white shark while diving off Glenelg in South Australia in 2005.

The inquest has turned into a trial of Shark Shield devices, hearing concerns that the electronic fields generated to repel sharks may attract them.

Studying cuttlefish for the University of Adelaide at the time of his death, Stehbens had been provided with two Shark Shields on his dive boat by university staff - but he either didn't know they were there or chose not to use them.

University staff have told Mr Schapel they questioned the Shark Shields' efficacy and believed there might be long-term health risks from using them. As a result, the devices were not compulsory.

Rod Hartley, director of Sea Change Technology, which manufactures the Shark Shields, yesterday took the stand to defend his product.

"There is no doubt whatsoever that it does not attract sharks," he said.

He told Mr Schapel he believed a disgruntled surfer had started the rumour.

"Nobody wearing a Shark Shield has ever been attacked by a shark," he added.

Mr Hartley said the failed South African test on the surf unit - which has been held back from release into the marketplace - was due to a problem with the electrode's configuration. The device was now packaged with a large disclaimer warning it would only repel sharks when the surfer was still in the water waiting for a wave.

"The surf product only can be guaranteed to work when it's stationary, not when it's surfing in the wave or paddling," Mr Hartley said.

 

Shark Shield
Snake oil
Shark repellent or snake oil aimed at parting fools from their money?  Michael Wescombe-Down, who designed the Shark Shield said the company that now sells the devices is falsely advertising the product.

CSIRO shark expert Barry Bruce has told the inquest the shark that killed Stehbens was in "full predatory strike" mode and would have been nearly impossible to deter. His body was never recovered.

Mr Schapel will publish his findings at a later date.

SOURCE - The Australian

CDNN RELATED NEWS

  • AUSTRALIA - Inquest: Scientists feared shark shields would attract sharks
  • AUSTRALIA - No evidence electric shark shields actually work says Australia government
  • SCUBA FORUM

  • DISCUSS THIS TOPIC - Dive in and have your say at Scuba Forum
  • KNOW BEFORE YOU GO

  • SCUBALINX :: Dive Australia
  • CYBER DIVER TRAVEL GUIDE :: Australia
  • CDNN DESTINATIONS :: Australia
  •  

    Scuba Diving

    CDNN TOP NEWS STORIES

     

     

       ADVANCED SEARCH

    site map         ::         notice         ::         privacy         ::         about us         ::         faq         ::         my news         ::         advertise         ::         contact

    © 1995 - 2008  CDNN GLOBAL NEWS NETWORK